Why did the Fed raise interest rates instead of cutting them in 2026?

The Fed raised rates because inflation stayed well above its 2% target through 2026, running near 3.7% (3.3% on a core basis), worsened by an oil price spike tied to the Middle East conflict. Fed chair Kevin Warsh said inflation had been too high for too long and hiked despite a public pressure campaign from the Trump administration urging a hold or a cut.

Did the Fed expect to cut rates in 2026?

Yes. In its December 2025 Summary of Economic Projections, the Fed's median forecast called for one more rate cut in 2026, which would have brought the benchmark rate to roughly 3.4% by year end. Instead, the Fed held rates steady through the summer and then raised them a quarter point to 3.75% to 4.00% in September, the opposite of what its own forecast nine months earlier had projected.

Does a Fed rate hike mean a recession is coming?

Not by itself. A rate hike raises the cost of borrowing on purpose, to cool demand, which does raise the risk of slower growth over time. But the September 2026 hike returned rates to a level the economy had already operated at for most of 2023 and 2024, and unemployment stood at 4.1% at the time, not a level typically associated with an imminent recession.

Why the Fed Raised Rates, Not Cut Them

Written by Grace Ene, self-taught investor and founder of Invest with Prudie. Eight years in B2B SaaS across revenue operations and customer success, now applied to showing the math instead of asking you to trust a black box.

Nine months before the Federal Reserve raised interest rates on September 16, 2026, its own economic projections pointed the other way: a cut, not a hike, was the median expectation for the year. Here is why a central bank that was planning to lower rates ended up raising them instead, and what that reversal says about how much weight any single Fed forecast deserves.

The short answer

The Federal Reserve raised interest rates instead of cutting them because inflation stayed well above its 2% target through 2026, worsened by an oil price spike tied to the Middle East conflict, and Fed chair Kevin Warsh judged that risk worse than slowing growth. The Fed's own December 2025 projection had called for one more rate cut in 2026, not a hike.

Wasn't the Fed supposed to be cutting rates in 2026?

Yes. The Fed cut its benchmark rate three times in 2024 and three more times in 2025, bringing it down to 3.50% to 3.75% by December 2025, according to the Fed's own record of policy moves. At that same December meeting, the median projection in the Fed's Summary of Economic Projections called for exactly one more cut in 2026, which would have brought the rate to roughly 3.4% by year end. Instead, the Fed held that rate steady at every meeting through July 2026, then reversed course entirely and raised it to 3.75% to 4.00% in September. The direction flipped, not just the pace.

So why did the Fed hike instead of holding or cutting?

Inflation would not cooperate. June's Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, the Fed's preferred inflation gauge, rose 3.7% year over year, and core PCE, which strips out food and energy, rose 3.3%, both well above target and essentially unchanged since. A widening Middle East conflict disrupting the Strait of Hormuz pushed oil prices sharply higher through the summer, and by September 15 the 10-year Treasury yield had touched its highest level since 2007. At his press conference the next day, Warsh said "the plain fact is inflation is too high, and has been for too long," and the Federal Open Market Committee voted 12 to 0 to raise the rate a quarter point to 3.75% to 4.00%, according to the Fed's official statement, its first increase since July 2023.

The mechanism in one line

Raising rates is the Fed's main tool against inflation because it makes borrowing more expensive, which cools spending, hiring, and price growth. Cutting rates does the opposite: it makes borrowing cheaper to support growth and jobs. When inflation is running hot and growth still looks solid, as it did in September 2026, the inflation mandate wins, even if the Fed's own calendar had predicted a cut.

Did political pressure to cut rates change anything?

Not according to the Fed. President Trump, Vice President Vance, and the Treasury secretary spent the ten days before the meeting publicly urging a hold or a cut, part of a pressure campaign for lower rates that ran through most of 2026. Warsh hiked anyway, saying the president "has had no impact" on the committee's decisions and that "independence is a two-way street." Trump called the Fed board "very hostile" and "very political" after the vote. Whatever role politics played behind closed doors, the Fed's stated reasoning ties the decision entirely to inflation data, not to who wanted which outcome.

⚠️

This took nine months and six swings in the odds to arrive at. See the full decision tracker for how a weak jobs report, a hawkish Jackson Hole speech, and a strong jobs report each moved the probability of a hike before the actual vote.

The honest counterargument: was hiking the right call?

Reasonable people disagree on whether this was the correct decision:

The case against hiking: much of 2026's inflation traced to an oil price spike tied to the Middle East conflict, a supply shock rather than runaway demand. Goldman Sachs argued as recently as August that a September hike was "very unlikely," on the view that a temporary shock does not call for tighter policy, especially with the labor market showing real signs of cooling earlier in the summer.
The case for hiking: Warsh's own data showed the problem was broader than oil. At his August Jackson Hole speech, he pointed out that 54% of PCE components had run above a 3% annualized pace over the prior year, evidence that price pressure had spread beyond energy into the kind of broad, sticky inflation that can become self-fulfilling if left unaddressed.
Both can be true. The Fed accepted real risk to growth and jobs to defend its inflation target, betting that a quarter-point hike now costs less than letting inflation expectations drift further from 2%.

What a beginner should actually do

Do not try to predict the Fed's next move from headlines. The Fed's own December 2025 projection called for a cut, and it hiked instead nine months later. If the people setting the rate cannot forecast their own path reliably, you should not build a plan around guessing it. See why time in the market beats timing it.
Put a rate hike's clearest benefit to work: your cash. See where to keep cash when rates are high for current savings, money market, and Treasury bill yields.
Understand what a hike does to bonds before adding any. See should beginners buy bonds now for how bond prices and yields move together.
Keep contributing on schedule regardless of which way rates move. See what rising rates actually mean for your portfolio.
Watch the data, not the calendar. The August PCE report lands September 30, and the Fed's next meeting is October 28, where CME FedWatch priced 73.5% odds of another hike as of September 24.

💡

The actionable takeaway: The Fed raised rates instead of cutting them because inflation stayed too high for too long, not because a cut was ever off the table by design. Its own forecast nine months earlier expected the opposite move. That gap between forecast and outcome is the real lesson: a long-term plan should be built to survive being wrong about the Fed, not to depend on being right about it.

The quick version

The Fed cut rates three times in 2024 and three times in 2025, reaching 3.50% to 3.75% by December 2025
Its own December 2025 median projection called for one more cut in 2026, not a hike
Instead, the Fed held steady for five straight meetings through July 2026, then raised rates a quarter point to 3.75% to 4.00% on September 16
The reason: inflation stuck near 3.7% (core 3.3%), well above the Fed's 2% target, worsened by an oil price spike tied to the Middle East conflict
Fed chair Kevin Warsh said inflation has been "too high, and has been for too long," and hiked despite a public pressure campaign from the Trump administration to hold or cut
Warsh said politics had no impact on the decision, calling independence "a two-way street"
16 of 18 officials who submitted projections at the September meeting expect at least one more hike in 2026
The right response for a long-term investor is unchanged: keep contributing on schedule and let your plan, not a guess about the Fed's next move, drive the decision

The lesson is not that the Fed misled anyone about its plans. The lesson is that the people setting interest rates are working from data that changes faster than any projection can keep up with, which is exactly why a long-term plan should not be built around guessing the Fed's next move.

Why did the Fed raise interest rates instead of cutting them?